Shield Breaker Security

Welcome to Shield Breaker Security

Committed to Justice. Empowered to Defend.

At Shield Breaker Security, we specialize in on-site armed protection and rights defense for civilians engaged with law enforcement. Unlike traditional security firms, we are fully dedicated to countering abuses of power and safeguarding the rights of individuals, particularly in situations where authority is misused.

Our services include:

Civilian Defense: Our trained security professionals stand by civilians during encounters with law enforcement, ensuring a balanced and lawful interaction that respects individual rights.
Anti-Corruption Intervention: We actively intervene when officials overstep legal boundaries, working to deter the misuse of authority by holding those in power accountable.
Protection of Property and Rights: From defense of property to preservation of personal freedoms, we uphold your rights under legal frameworks such as the Castle Doctrine.
Forceful Detainment of Corrupt Officers: For officers who exploit their position, we provide lawful citizen detainment and restraint to halt unjust practices.

At Shield Breaker Security, we are dedicated to serving as a formidable barrier against rights violations, corruption, and misuse of authority. Your protection is our top priority, and we are here to ensure your rights are respected and defended, no matter the circumstances.

On Scene Armed Security

When you’re facing uncertainty and need to ensure your rights are protected, we stand ready as the skilled advocates by your side. You don’t have to face intimidating situations alone, our team provides the strength and expertise you can count on when it matters most.

Home Security Evaluations

Protect what matters most with solutions designed just for you. From top-of-the-line security systems to instant automated response options, we’re here to ensure your safety and peace of mind,
every step of the way.

Active Home Defense & Security Systems

Your family’s safety is priceless, and protecting them is one of the most important things you can do. In uncertain times, take proactive steps to safeguard their lives and your peace of mind. With our expert solutions, you’re choosing more than just protection, you’re choosing confidence, security, and the knowledge that your loved ones are shielded from harm. Protect your family like their lives depend on it, because sometimes,
they truly do.

We Treat Them, How They Treat You!

Dont be a victim, or another statistic on the news. You have the RIGHT to stand your ground and fight back against corrupt Police attempting to violate your rights or the law. To often private citizens like you and I violated by corrupt heavily armed psychopaths on power trips. Why? the average citizen does not know they have the right to fight police on power trips, with lethal force if necessary.

Obstruction of Justice
Indiana Code § 35-44.1-2-2

Official Misconduct
Indiana Code § 35-44.1-1-1

Deprivation of Rights
Under Color of Law
Federal Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 242

False Statements or Misrepresentation
Indiana Code § 35-43-5-4 (Fraud)

This information is in compliance with Indiana codes and all federal laws.

Indiana Code § 35-41-3-2

Sec. 2. (a) In enacting this section, the general assembly finds and declares that it is the policy of this state to recognize the unique character of a citizen's home and to ensure that a citizen feels secure in his or her own home against unlawful intrusion by another individual or a public servant. By reaffirming the long standing right of a citizen to protect his or her home against unlawful intrusion, however, the general assembly does not intend to diminish in any way the other robust self defense rights that citizens of this state have always enjoyed. Accordingly, the general assembly also finds and declares that it is the policy of this state that people have a right to defend themselves and third parties from physical harm and crime. The purpose of this section is to provide the citizens of this state with a lawful means of carrying out this policy. Provisions concerning civil immunity for the justified use of force as defined in this section are codified under IC 34-30-31.

(b) As used in this section, “public servant” means a person described in IC 35-31.5-2-129 or IC 35-31.5-2-185.
(c) A person is justified in using reasonable force against any other person to protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person:
(1) is justified in using deadly force; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat; if the person reasonably believes that that force is necessary to prevent serious bodily injury to the person or a third person or the commission of a forcible felony. No person, employer, or estate of a person in this state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting the person or a third person by reasonable means necessary.

(d) A person:
(1) is justified in using reasonable force, including deadly force, against any other person; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat; if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent or terminate the other person's unlawful entry of or attack on the person's dwelling, curtilage, or occupied motor vehicle.
(e) With respect to property other than a dwelling, curtilage, or an occupied motor vehicle, a person is justified in using reasonable force against any other person if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to immediately prevent or terminate the other person's trespass on or criminal interference with property lawfully in the person's possession, lawfully in possession of a member of the person's immediate family, or belonging to a person whose property the person has authority to protect. However, a person:
(1) is justified in using deadly force; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
only if that force is justified under subsection (c).

(f) A person is justified in using reasonable force, including deadly force, against any other person and does not have a duty to retreat if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent or stop the other person from hijacking, attempting to hijack, or otherwise seizing or attempting to seize unlawful control of an aircraft in flight. For purposes of this subsection, an aircraft is considered to be in flight while the aircraft is:
(1) on the ground in Indiana:
(A) after the doors of the aircraft are closed for takeoff; and
(B) until the aircraft takes off;
(2) in the airspace above Indiana; or
(3) on the ground in Indiana:
(A) after the aircraft lands; and
(B) before the doors of the aircraft are opened after landing.

(g) Notwithstanding subsections (c) through (e), a person is not justified in using force if:
(1) the person is committing or is escaping after the commission of a crime;
(2) the person provokes unlawful action by another person with intent to cause bodily injury to the other person; or
(3) the person has entered into combat with another person or is the initial aggressor unless the person withdraws from the encounter and communicates to the other person the intent to do so and the other person nevertheless continues or threatens to continue unlawful action.

(h) Notwithstanding subsection (f), a person is not justified in using force if the person:
(1) is committing, or is escaping after the commission of, a crime;
(2) provokes unlawful action by another person, with intent to cause bodily injury to the other person; or
(3) continues to combat another person after the other person withdraws from the encounter and communicates the other person's intent to stop hijacking, attempting to hijack, or otherwise seizing or attempting to seize unlawful control of an aircraft in flight.

(i) A person is justified in using reasonable force against a public servant if the person reasonably believes the force is necessary to:
(1) protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force;
(2) prevent or terminate the public servant's unlawful entry of or attack on the person's dwelling, curtilage, or occupied motor vehicle; or
(3) prevent or terminate the public servant's unlawful trespass on or criminal interference with property lawfully in the person's possession, lawfully in possession of a member of the person's immediate family, or belonging to a person whose property the person has authority to protect.

(j) Notwithstanding subsection (i), a person is not justified in using force against a public servant if:
(1) the person is committing or is escaping after the commission of a crime;
(2) the person provokes action by the public servant with intent to cause bodily injury to the public servant;
(3) the person has entered into combat with the public servant or is the initial aggressor, unless the person withdraws from the encounter and communicates to the public servant the intent to do so and the public servant nevertheless continues or threatens to continue unlawful action; or
(4) the person reasonably believes the public servant is:
(A) acting lawfully; or
(B) engaged in the lawful execution of the public servant's official duties.

(k) A person is not justified in using deadly force against a public servant whom the person knows or reasonably should know is a public servant unless:
(1) the person reasonably believes that the public servant is:
(A) acting unlawfully; or
(B) not engaged in the execution of the public servant's official duties; and
(2) the force is reasonably necessary to prevent serious bodily injury to the person or a third person.

Indiana Code § 35-33-1-4

Sec. 4. (a) Any person may arrest any other person if:
(1) the other person committed a felony in his presence;
(2) a felony has been committed and he has probable cause to believe that the other person has committed that felony; or
(3) a misdemeanor involving a breach of peace is being committed in his presence and the arrest is necessary to prevent the continuance of the breach of peace.
(b) A person making an arrest under this section shall, as soon as practical, notify a law enforcement officer and deliver custody of the person arrested to a law enforcement officer.
(c) The law enforcement officer may process the arrested person as if the officer had arrested him. The officer who receives or processes a person arrested by another under this section is not liable for false arrest or false imprisonment.

Report abuse